|
![]() |
|
7-year old Rosie. Regular oyster shucker.
Her second year at it. Illiterate. Works all day. Shucks only a few pots a day. (Showing process) Varn & Platt Canning
Co. Location: Bluffton, South Carolina, February 1913, Lewis Hine.
"Little Rosie (Berdich)" one of our former friends that I found in Bluffton 3
years ago. She has given up shucking, because her mother is afraid of the law, and is attending school regularly as long as
they are in the south. Location: Bluffton, South Carolina / L.W. Hine, February 1916. "She used to talk about when
she was young and they traveled from Baltimore to South Carolina and back to pick fruits and vegetables. I know that she grew
up in Baltimore. They were poor, and they lived in a tenement house. She never talked about going to school. We always wondered
how she learned to read and write." -Mary Agnes Taylor, daughter of Rose Berdych Rose Berdych has the distinction
of apparently being the only child laborer that Lewis Hine photographed, and then photographed again on a return visit. In
my research so far, I have found (not surprisingly) only one case where a child laborer remembered being photographed by Hine;
but one would think that Rose might have remembered Hine and his camera the second time he took her picture, only three years
after their first encounter. But she never mentioned it to the descendants I interviewed. The contrast between the two photos is striking. In the second photo, Rose is neat
and clean, and nicely dressed for school. Hine says: "She has given up shucking, because her mother is afraid of the
law, and is attending school regularly as long as they are in the south." Could that mean that if and when the family
returns to Baltimore, her mother will take Rose out of school again? On his two visits, Hine took a total of eight pictures
of Rose. The following is excerpted from the Sixth Annual
Conference of the National Child Labor Committee, in January of 1910: Dr. McKelway: Mr. Chairman, I paid a visit to Pass Christian, Miss., last spring. I had investigated
the oyster canning industry in the Gulf States to some extent before. I was amazed at the number of small children who were
employed in the oyster shucking factories. There are a good many along the Gulf coast, and some on the South Carolina coast.
I found that the workers were Bohemian and Polish children from Baltimore. Our chief adversary in the fight for a better child
labor law in Florida was the owner of an oyster cannery in Apalachicola. I visited his factory and saw acres of oyster shells
there fifteen feet deep, and a great proportion of those oysters had been taken out of the shells by little children. We would
not make any exemption in the Florida law, although we had to accept the twelve-year-age limit, and last year the proposal
was made again that we could have the fourteen-year-age limit if we would exempt this oyster canning industry, which we declined
to do. Now here was a very interesting
situation, that these people were brought from Baltimore and other parts of Maryland and Delaware in the winter season to
shuck the oysters along the Gulf coast. Mr. Hine went to Maryland and made some investigations there, and he made a very interesting
study of the situation and took a large number of photographs. The children in this oyster canning industry and fruit and
vegetable canning industries are smaller than any children I ever saw in industrial work, smaller even than in the southern
cotton mills. Miss Goldmark has spoken of the prejudice against these children and the difficulty of taking them into the
schools. I found the same prejudice to exist in Florida, and the difficulty there is that they have had no compulsory school
law, so the children have absolutely no schooling. The schools are not open in Maryland in the canning season, and then in
the winter months the workers go to the Gulf coast. Miss Anna Herkner: It is perfectly possible for a child to be born in Baltimore and grow up to the
age of fourteen and never attend school. That is what is going on all the time. I want to make just a slight correction to
something Dr. McKelway said. It is mostly Poles and not Bohemians who go south. Bohemians have done that in times past, but
the public schools have had an Americanizing influence, so they have now reached the stage where they understand American
institutions better. The first children - the first generation of those born here, who do not come under the influence of
the public school, make the troublesome element in our community. The Poles in Baltimore are now at the stage where the Bohemians
were twenty years ago. They work in canneries and on farms under such conditions as have been described. The child labor law
in Maryland permits them to work in the cannery both in the country and in the city until the middle of October. It is usually
November before they all get back, and about the end of November they begin going south. There are any number of families
who do that, who have done that for years, and we have now children, many cases I know, who have never been to school. The possibility of regulating the migration
of people from one state to another was discussed, and Dr. McKelway suggested a license tax upon agents who go into a state
to get laborers for other states. North Carolina and Tennessee have laws of this kind. He said, "If Maryland would pass
a similar law, it would at least discourage this wholesale migration to the southern states." The fact was brought out
that many of the children work in Maryland canneries until the middle of October. Before the truant officer reaches them to
compel attendance, they have gone south to work.
Rosie, (on the left) regular oyster
shucker. A smaller one will be working soon. Varn and Platt Canning Co. Location: Bluffton, South Carolina, February 1913,
Lewis Hine.
Housing conditions of the white workers
in Varn & Platt Canning Co. Location: Bluffton, South Carolina, February 1913, Lewis Hine. Continue with story, which includes interviews, and many photos |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
|
All rights reserved. This website, and all of its contents, except
where noted, is copyrighted by, and is the sole property of Joe Manning (aka Joseph H. Manning), of Florence, Massachusetts.
None of the contents of this website may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
including copying, recording, downloading, or by any other information storage and retrieval system, without written permission
from Joe Manning, or his rightful heirs. |